At a bare minimum, familiarize yourself with each of these commands: git clone, git add, git commit, git pull, git push, git branch, git checkout, and git merge (these are all covered in the first 3 chapters of the Pro Git book). Specifically, please familiarize yourself with the following basic Git concepts: Chapters 1-3 and 6.1 - 6.3 are especially important. Git Reference Material 1.i Basics of Git:Review the Pro Git book. Severson Group Git Workflow and Guidelinesġ.In her downtime, she loves to travel, read, quilt, hike, and spend time with her family.Thus is the Severson Group Git Tutorial adapted from Most recently, she has focused on test strategy implementation and training, development process efficiencies, and preaching Test Driven Development to anyone that will listen. She’s passionate about making an impact in education and loves coaching team members in product and client-focused quality practices. About the AuthorĪshley Hunsberger is a Quality Architect at Blackboard, Inc. Also, be sure to check out Sumo Logic Developers for free tools and code that will enable you to monitor and troubleshoot applications from code to production. If you’d like to learn more or contribute, visit. Who Broke My Test? A Git Bisect Tutorial is published by the Sumo Logic DevOps Community. But until I live in Tester’s Utopia, I’ll use git bisect. Of course, in my perfect world, it wouldn’t only be my team that monitors and cares about the results. In this case, we were able to quickly go to the engineer, alert the engineer that a specific commit broke the tests, and work together to understand why and how to fix it. ![]() Using git bisect can help reduce that time and really pinpoint what exactly went wrong. When you are in the process of stabilizing tests, it can be fairly time-consuming to determine if a failure is a result of a test, or the result of an actual bug. I had everything I needed to go back to the engineer (with proof!) and start getting my tests green again. I continued to grab the commit, run tests, and set them as git good until I found my culprit-and it took me only three steps (versus running through about 15 commits)! When my tests failed, I had to identify the bad commit.Īha! I knew the specific commit that broke my test, who did it, and when. This narrowed down my results even further and gave me a similar message. So-I grabbed it, ran my tests-and they all passed. Then, I needed to test the commit that bisect came up with. It told me how many revisions were between the identified commit and my bad commit (previously identified), how many more steps I should have to find the culprit, and which commit I next needed to look at. This helped identify the middle commit between what I identified as good and bad, cutting my options in half. When I ran git bisect bad, I got a message in the following format:īisecting: revisions left to test after this (roughly steps) But git bisect prevents you from having to do that. Now, without bisect, I might have had to pull down each commit, run my tests, and see which started failing between good and bad. I had a bunch of commits between the good and bad (in my case, 15), and needed to find which one between our 11 AM and 5 PM run broke our tests. Back to SourceTree! I found a commit from around 5 PM (where I noticed the first failure), so I thought I’d check that one out. Now that I’d established my GOOD build, I had time to figure out where I thought the bad build occured. Git bisect good Narrowing down the suspects ![]() I ran some tests against that commit, and all passed, confirming I had a good build. A simple double-click of that commit and I was in. I went into SourceTree and found a commit from around 11 AM that I thought would be good. Looking at my build history in Jenkins, I noted the date/times I had a passing build (around 11 AM), and when it started showing up red (around 5 PM). (Side note-this isn’t really a tool if you’re looking over the last few months, but if it’s within recent history-days-it’s handy). Getting started with Git bisectįirst, I had to narrow down the timeline. Luckily for me, a developer friend told me about git bisect (I’m relatively new to this world), and helped me quickly track down which commit broke my tests. I had to do a little bit of detective work. It was a three-day weekend-time to relax! I came in Tuesday, fired up my machine, logged into Jenkins…RED. I left for the weekend with my Jenkins dashboard looking nice and green. Not only is it a great tool for developers, but it’s also very useful for testers (like myself). What exactly is it? Git bisect is a binary search to help find the commit that introduced a bug. This Git Bisect tutorial will guide you through the basic process. ![]() Git bisect is a great way to help narrow down who (and what) broke something in your test-and it is incredibly easy to learn.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |